Warm Southern Breeze

"… there is no such thing as nothing."

Exactly whose idea was this “Sequester” thing anyway?

Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Whose idea was this “sequester” anyway?

Would you believe Mitch McConnell & John Boehner?

Yeah, but McConnell & the GOP are calling it “the president’s sequester”!

Yes, they are. And they want to deceive you.

In other words, they’re lying.

Kentucky’s senior Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, who is the Senate Minority Leader, along with Speaker of the House of Representatives Ohio Congressman John Boehner have both called the impending drastic across-the-board budget cuts & tax increases as “the president’s sequester.”

However, the idea did NOT originate with President Obama.

For the benefit of those whose (choose any combination of the following):
1.) Memories are short, and/or;
2.) Weren’t paying attention in class and/or;
3.) Believe teevee’s talking heads, and/or;
4.) Believe the GOP.

Give particular attention to the last paragraph in the first story, which states in part that,

“McConnell, the chief Republican architect of the compromise, has been adamant that no tax increases will come out of the joint committee. And he and Boehner have effective control given that they will hand-pick six of the 12 members. That said, the defense lobby — a strong force still among Republicans —will most feel the impact of any sequester, and the industry is already being squeezed by the revised appropriations targets set for 2012 and 2013.”

Finally, I would remind the reader that because the GOP’s radical philosophical ideology of privatizing practically every government service (which places public tax dollars in private pockets – is that anything like “welfare”?) harsh across-the-board budget cuts are precisely what the GOP has begged for from Day One.

Debt ceiling disaster averted, but nobody’s really happy

By: David Rogers
August 2, 2011 11:30 PM EST

Running short of cash, Treasury won an immediate reprieve of $400 billion in new borrowing authority Tuesday with the enactment of a hotly contested debt and deficit-reduction agreement hammered out between Republicans and the White House on Sunday night.

President Barack Obama, not hiding his frustration, quickly signed the measure sent to him by Congress after a final 74-26 Senate roll call, capping an unprecedented hard-edged political struggle that had pushed the nation to the brink of default.

Indeed, the stakes were far larger than with the April shutdown fight, and more than any single event this year, the debt battle captured all the power — and critics would say extreme risk-taking — of the anti-government backlash that fueled the GOP’s gains in the 2010 elections.

The timing makes it a gamble too with the faltering recovery. Most of the promised $2.1 trillion in deficit reduction will take place in the out years, but discretionary spending will continue to fall in 2012 and the same Congressional Budget Office — which scored the cuts — will soon issue its August economic update, which could show slower growth.

House Speaker John Boehner has argued the opposite: More aggressively addressing deficits “will in fact provide more confidence for employers in America, the people we expect to reinvest in our economy and create jobs.” But a sell-off Tuesday on Wall Street sent the Dow down 265 points, reflecting growing pessimism about the economic outlook. And as lawmakers left for the summer recess, Democrats vowed to turn the agenda more toward job creation when they return.

“We crossed a bridge,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) “Enough talk about the debt. We have to talk about jobs.”

Obama signaled as much in a Rose Garden appearance after the Senate vote. Extending his 2-percentage-point cut in payroll taxes remains a priority and the appropriations bargain, in fact, gives him a leg up in bargaining with House Republicans over investments billed as part of his jobs agenda.

“It was a long and contentious debate” Obama said of the debt fight. “And I want to thank the American people for keeping up the pressure on their elected officials to put politics aside and work together.

“Voters may have chosen divided government, but they sure didn’t vote for dysfunctional government. They want us to solve problems. They want us to get this economy growing and adding jobs.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who played a central role in crafting the final compromise with Vice President Joe Biden, was more upbeat.

“It may have been messy. It might have appeared to some like their government wasn’t working,” McConnell told fellow senators minutes before the vote. “But, in fact, the opposite was true. The push and pull Americans saw in Washington these past few weeks was not gridlock. It was the will of the people working itself out in a political system that was never meant to be pretty. … It was a debate that Washington needed to have.”

Pretty it wasn’t — late-night weekend sessions, insults, backstabbing among leaders and multiple press conferences by a besieged president all played out in the hottest July in Washington on record.

Down to the end, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl angrily protested the defense spending cuts assumed in the package, but he and other top Republicans fell in line behind McConnell, who won a solid majority, 28 votes, from his caucus together with 45 Democrats and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.

“This problem wasn’t created overnight, and it won’t be solved overnight,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), who turned to Amtrak to capture the mood. “If I were sitting at Union Station trying to catch a train to New York City, and someone offered me a ticket to Baltimore or Philadelphia, I’d take it and then find a way to get to New York from there.”

The debt ceiling increments have their own train schedule.

The $400 billion, which became available immediately upon a certification submitted by Obama to Congress on Tuesday afternoon, will first help Treasury backfill some of the estimated $237 billion in “extraordinary measures” it has taken since the spring to keep itself afloat. But auctions for new borrowing could be announced as early as Wednesday.

A second $500 billion adjustment in the debt ceiling will then be needed this fall but is all but guaranteed under the procedures agreed to by the Republican leadership. And to get through 2012, Obama will be able to tap an additional $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion, depending on the success or failure of a new joint committee assigned to report a major deficit-reduction bill by late November.

The first two increments, totaling $900 billion, are offset by $917 billion in 10-year savings achieved by cutting annual appropriations to $1.043 trillion in 2012 — nearly $100 billion below Obama’s February budget — and then slowing the rate of future growth to a fraction of inflation.

The second debt tranche would be offset as well under the agreement, either through the joint committee’s work product or automatic across-the-board cuts that would most heavily hit defense spending.

The $1.2 trillion is the minimum standard set and represents a rough approximation of the maximum savings that Republicans were assuming when talks broke off between the president and Boehner on July 22.

Days later, Boehner upped the target as high as $1.8 trillion — the first of several moves the speaker made to try to win over conservatives in his caucus. He ultimately succeeded in narrowly passing a House bill, but precious time was lost in the process, and in accepting the $1.2 trillion standard, he has essentially moved closer to his prior understandings with the White House.

Even so, getting to $1.2 trillion won’t be easy for the joint committee. Obama made concessions to Boehner in the context of expecting tax reform and that some additional revenues would be part of the mix. If the joint committee stalemates on that question — which seems likely now — the panel could come up with less, perhaps $1 trillion for example, and then rely on the across-the-board cuts or sequester to complete the job with another $200 billion in savings.

McConnell, the chief Republican architect of the compromise, has been adamant that no tax increases will come out of the joint committee. And he and Boehner have effective control given that they will hand-pick six of the 12 members. That said, the defense lobby — a strong force still among Republicans —will most feel the impact of any sequester, and the industry is already being squeezed by the revised appropriations targets set for 2012 and 2013. And a second force is the commodity lobby, which thrives on futures trading and is already calculating whether it would fare better under across-the-board cuts to farm programs rather than submit to what could very likely be bigger reductions ordered by the joint committee.


Ryan defends vote for sequestration deal

By Jeremy Herb – 09/09/12 10:45 AM ET

GOP vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Sunday defended his vote for the Budget Control Act (BCA) that set sequestration in motion, even as Mitt Romney called it a “big mistake” for Republican leaders to accept the deal.

The sequestration cuts of $109 billion in 2013, including $55 billion to defense, were agreed to in the 2011 Budget Control Act that raised the debt ceiling. The cuts became law after the supercommittee failed to reach a deal on deficit reduction, and will go into effect Jan. 2.

The Romney campaign and Republicans have blamed Obama for sequestration, but a majority of Republicans, including Ryan, voted for it.

On CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday, Ryan argued that his vote for the BCA was not a vote for the defense cuts under sequestration, but rather a “down payment” on deficit reduction.

“The goal was never that these defense cuts actually occur,” Ryan said.

Ryan said that the House Republicans have already passed a bill that he authored to reverse the sequester for 2013.

“We passed in the House a bill by cutting spending elsewhere. The Senate does nothing,” he said.

But on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Romney said it was a big mistake for Ryan and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to accept the deal.

“I thought it was a mistake on the part of the White House to propose it. I think it was a mistake for Republicans to go along with it,” Romney said.

Ryan again placed the blame for the sequester on the White House, accusing Obama of “putting politics ahead of national security” after a new book by Bob Woodward said that the idea for sequestration originated in the White House.

Obama campaign spokeswoman Lis Smith said Romney and Ryan had “tripped over their answer” and contradicted each other over sequestration.

“The fact remains that we could prevent the automatic defense cuts if Congressional Republicans drop their refusal to ask for another dime from millionaires and billionaires,” she said in a statement.

This story was updated at 12:08 p.m.


2 Responses to “Exactly whose idea was this “Sequester” thing anyway?”

  1. […] Exactly whose idea was this “Sequester” thing anyway? (warmsouthernbreeze.wordpress.com) […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: