Many make the mistake thinking that anti-censorship laws – the First Amendment, most notably – apply to business. They do not. Anti-censorship laws apply ONLY to government.
Instances of such mistaken thought have been on display of late, particularly with respect to some of the foolish remarks made by certain Congressional Representatives, and Senators, while in Committee hearings with the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook pursuant to their banning, or temporarily blocking certain high profile users of their service in the dissemination of lies, which were not merely false, but disruptive, tended toward incivility, and inciting public unrest.
Censorship is sometimes called “prior restraint,” because it prohibits an action, in this case, speech or other First Amendment rights, from occurring, or being exercised. It is not done after the fact. It is ALWAYS done beforehand.
But, with respect to private enterprise, non-governmental entities, businesses and such, they are free to their heart’s delight to censor. There is NO LAW prohibiting them from exercising that prerogative.

On May 10, 1933, university students in Opera Square in Berlin and elsewhere throughout Nazi Germany burned thousands of books in an ominous cleansing of anything considered un-German from the national culture. (U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, National Archives and Records)
When it comes to matters of education, the ideological equivalent to censorship is banning books, and book burning – both practices which have historically been employed by authoritarian, totalitarian regimes, and not just in modernity.
Historians of Read the rest of this entry »
American Entitlement Culture
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Thursday, October 10, 2013
Recently, I happened across an item which read “When they analyze the demise of western society due to the entitlement epidemic, it’ll trace back to giving kids awards just for showing up.”
Of course, it can sometimes be difficult to discern sarcasm when reading, and I rather suspect there is at least a smidgen of sarcasm in that brief remark.
Sarcasm, of course, can, and is often used to convey a truth, or truths about numerous subjects, and is a teaching tool, as well.
Because I often use dictionaries to aid my understanding, I chose to look up the definition of the word “entitlement.” Here’s what I found:
As a verb, to “entitle” is to give someone a legal right, or a just claim to receive or do something.
For example, in the United States, the First Amendment is an entitlement to Read the rest of this entry »
Rate this:
I Gotta' Share This!
Like this:
Posted in - Did they REALLY say that?, - Even MORE Uncategorized!, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home. | Tagged: Berkshire, commentary, Constitution, culture, Disability Insurance, education, England, Entitlement, entitlements, Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax, First Amendment, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, freedom, Freedom of speech, GOP, government, insurance, irony, Language Arts, money, Natural and legal rights, news, OASDI, Obamacare, Old-Age, politics, Reading, Reading Instruction, Republican, Republicans, retirement, rights, sarcasm, shutdown, Social Security, Social Security Trust Fund, society, trust fund, Trust law, truth, United States, United States Constitution, wealth | Leave a Comment »