Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Friday, July 27, 2012
No… no… no…
Banks don’t need to be regulated.
They’re doing quite fine with all the money they’ve stolen from you already.
No, they don’t need regulation.
And no, we don’t need to re-enact the Glass-Steagall Act – the federal law that kept Wall Street Brokerage Houses, Insurance Companies, and Banks separate and out of each other’s business. Right now, as things stand with them, they’re enjoying an incestuous fiscal orgy. And that’s good. We need more incest. We need more orgies. They’re all good. In fact, the more mammon… er, money you have, the more holy you are, the more the Almighty has blessed you – and not someone else (those lazy slobs who don’t deserve anything). {/sarcasm}
But there’s really no reason to worry… the banks will get what’s comin’ to ’em – and the ‘what’ is NOT your money. They have that already.
Come a-courtin’ time (that’d be in the court room), the Banksters be ruled against in a BIG way.
Just wait.
It’s coming.
Next thing you’ll hear in the news are the BIG BANKSTERS wanting legal protection from Congress for the wrongdoing they’ve done.
Just wait.
—
by David Kestenbaum
We’ve been talking a lot lately about what’s been dubbed the “LIBOR rate fixing scandal,” where some of the biggest banks in the world have been accused of manipulating a key global interest rate.
If those words — “manipulation of a key interest rate” — leave you wondering what the big deal is, and who would be harmed, meet Dan Sullivan. He says the manipulation of LIBOR cost him a million dollars, in just 24 hours.
Dan Sullivan used to work Read the rest of this entry »
34.730369
-86.586104
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in - Did they REALLY say that?, - Faith, Religion, Goodness - What is the Soul of a man?, - Read 'em and weep: The Daily News | Tagged: "Occupy Wall Street", $453 million, accounts, banking, bankruptcy, banks, Banksters, Barclays, Barclays Bank, Bernie Sanders, Big Business, CBOT, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, collusion, Congress, credit default swaps, derivatives, Derivatives market, Fed, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve System, fiscal, fraud, Glass-Steagall Act, Individual Retirement Account, insurance, Interest rate, investment, investment bank, JPMorgan Chase, law, Lehman Brothers, LIBOR, London, London Interbank Offered Rate, lying, manipulate, monetary policy, money, office, OWS, penalize, penalty, policy, retirement, risk, risky business, Ron Paul, stealing, stock brokerage houses, theft, trader, Wall Street | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Monday, July 23, 2012
Surely this doesn’t surprise anyone.

The expressed sentiment of many American citizens.
There were voices decrying bailing out WALL STREET STOCK BROKERAGE HOUSES, BIG INSURANCE, BIG BUSINESS, “TOO BIG TO FAIL” BANKS, to the disadvantage of the American people.
From one perspective, TARP was a “good deal” because most of the money loaned has been repaid on time.
However, from another perspective (or two), the people (who make the economy run) were NOT “bailed out” and continue to suffer. That is, the objective (economic recovery) did not occur – at least to the extent it was hoped would occur. And their input into the economy continues to be abysmal, which in turn means that our national economy at large remains significantly unrecovered.
There are some who argue that the “bailout money” should have gone directly into the hands & pockets of American citizens & consumers because their spending would have stimulated the economy.
However, as it has been, the “bailout money” has gone to WALL STREET STOCK BROKERAGE HOUSES, BIG INSURANCE, BIG BUSINESS, “TOO BIG TO FAIL” BANKS, and the results have been – to put it politely – less then stellar.
—
Behind the scenes of the bank bailouts
Tess Vigeland: It’s been almost four years since Lehman Brothers went under and the world’s financial system started to spin out of control. The fall of 2008 was all about Henry Paulson‘s bazooka, the Troubled Asset Relief Program — TARP — a $700 billion bailout for the banks. The bailout legislation created a special inspector general at the Treasury Department to oversee where all that money was going.
Neil Barofsky performed the job until he resigned early in 2011. Now he’s out with a tell-all book of his experiences in Washington, including the time he was pretty sure Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was about to haul off and punch him. It’s called Read the rest of this entry »
34.730369
-86.586104
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in - Lost In Space: TOTALLY Discombobulated, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home., - Read 'em and weep: The Daily News | Tagged: bailout, Capital Purchase Program, Henry Paulson, Henry Paulson. Wall Street, Inspector General, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Neil Barofsky, TARP, Timothy Geithner, Troubled Asset Relief Program, Wall Street | 2 Comments »
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Tuesday, March 16, 2010
When you sell a thing, you no longer own it.
Right?
Not so in the make-believe world of Wall Street!
In the make-believe world of Wall Street, when you sell a thing, you STILL own it!
Huh?
Well, Lehman Brothers “sold” $50 BILLION of their assets, but kept possession of them, and made it appear as if they no longer owned them. Normal folks would consider that fraud, or theft. So does a U.S. Federal Bankruptcy Examiner.
Financial regulators in the United Kingdom are investigating bankrupt American Lehman Brothers for hiding more than $50,000,000,000 ($50 BILLION) in their accounts, through criminal transactions nick-named “repo transactions.”
What could you do with an extra $200 or so? …Continue…
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in - Lost In Space: TOTALLY Discombobulated, - Read 'em and weep: The Daily News | Tagged: "You give business a bad name.", accountants, assholes, bankers, bankruptcy, bastards, cheats, chiseler, court, criminals, Ernst & Young, federal, finance, financiers, fraud, greedy, hookwink, international, Lehman Brothers, liars, money, money grubbers, scumbags, swindler, theft, thieves, traders, U.K., U.S., UK, Wall Street | Leave a Comment »