Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Monday, February 6, 2017
Nick Hanauer, a multi-billionaire about whom few have likely heard, authored a highly publicized article not too long ago warning about wealth inequity. Increasingly, the wealthy are realizing that a strategy of cutting taxes upon the wealthy and their corporations is not a recipe for American success, precisely for the reason that it adversely affects economic infrastructure, and jobs, among other damages.
However, one needn’t be wealthy to realize and understand that money, and the unreasonable desire for it known as avarice (an extreme form of greed), and the unwieldy power that accompanies it, are corrupting influences in any nation, and particularly in our United States because of SCOTUS ruling in the 2010 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission decision which Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in - Business... None of yours, - Did they REALLY say that?, - Faith, Religion, Goodness - What is the Soul of a man?, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home. | Tagged: 14th Amendment, avarice, billionaire, business, Canadian Alliance candidates 2000 Canadian federal election, capital, Citizens United, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Congress, Constitution, Constitutional rights, economic infrastructure, entrepreneurship, equal protection, Equal Protection Clause, Federal Election Commission, First Amemendment, freedom, greed, income, Jeff Bezos, jobs, justice, law, Liberty, money, Nick Hanauer, poor, poverty, rights, SOCTUS, state, taxes, Washington, wealth, wealthy | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Sunday, April 15, 2012
Among political observers of all stripe, there is broad consensus that the ruling handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, will continue to negatively affect the political process.
Some years ago I held that the only way to completely eliminate the corrupting influence of money in our political process was to allow donations – even in unlimited amounts as Super PACs do – and to place all funds in one pool, and divide the funds equally among all candidates. By so doing, candidates and incumbents would not have to be concerned with raising money for election campaigns. In essence, what we have now is a perpetual campaigning process in which elected officials continuously attend functions where money is raised, and in some cases transferred personally. Many of them have publicly expressed great distress at the time it takes away from their ability to govern and to perform the duties and responsibilities for which they were elected.
In essence, what we would have is a public/private partnership pool, which could have the best of both worlds.
Candidates could Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home., - Read 'em and weep: The Daily News | Tagged: Barack Obama, campaign, Citizens United, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, corruption, Democratic National Committee, fund raising, John McCain, Mitt Romney, money, Obama, Political action committee, politics, Republican, Republicans, Restore Our Future, Romney, SCOTUS, Sheldon Adelson, Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, United States | 4 Comments »