Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Some assert that everyone should pay the same rate of taxes, claiming that one “flat rate” would solve many problems.
I beg to differ.
The inequality of the so-called “flat tax” is quite simply, self-evident, because given that the cost of living is indexed similarly, the one whom has more income and wealth does not use as much to live, whereas the less fortunate and less wealthy use a greater percentage of their income to make ends meet.
Put another way, if it costs $500 annually to live, and you make $1000, that’s 50% of your income.
If it costs $500 annually to live and you make $10,000 that’s 5% of your income.
Who, then, does a flat tax benefit? Read the rest of this entry »
34.730369
-86.586104
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in - Faith, Religion, Goodness - What is the Soul of a man?, - My Hometown is the sweetest place I know, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home. | Tagged: Average Joe, Barney Frank, Bucharest, Bush, Chris Dodd, Clinton, Congress, economic, Economic inequality, economy, federal, fiscal policy, Flat tax, governance, government, Great Depression, House, House of Representatives, income, inequality, John McCain, law, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Obama, Philosophy, policy, poverty, Progressive tax, Republican Party (United States), senate, Social Darwinism, tax, Taxation, United States, wealth | 5 Comments »