Perversions of Justice & Twisted Interpretations of Our Constitution by Activist Judges
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Saturday, November 10, 2012
Once, upon a time (in my lifetime), there was little to no need for $uch $pending as we recently witnessed in the November 2012 General Election.
Formerly, Pre$ident$ and Congre$$ were elected without much money.
Now, due in large part to perverted interpretation of our Constitution from activist judges – whom have been largely installed by those whom decry the same – money has been equated with free speech.
But the solitary problem with that SCOTUS ruling is that ~if~ it is so (that money is free speech), then the poor man has none. And our founders most certainly did NOT write, nor did they assert any such thing as “money is freedom” of any kind.
Ref: Buckley v Valeo & Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
Those two rulings are perversions of justice, twisted interpretations of our Constitution and common law.
34.730369
-86.586104
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
This entry was posted on Saturday, November 10, 2012 at 7:40 PM and is filed under - Faith, Religion, Goodness - What is the Soul of a man?, - Lost In Space: TOTALLY Discombobulated, - My Hometown is the sweetest place I know, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home..
Tagged: Antonin Scalia, Buckley, Buckley v. Valeo, Citizens United, commentary, David Wiggins, fact, Federal Election Commission, Freedom of speech, GOP, Iowa, judicial activism, justice, law, liars, money, opinion, perverts, Republicans, Supreme Court of the United States, truth, United States, United States Constitution. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Perversions of Justice & Twisted Interpretations of Our Constitution by Activist Judges
Posted by Warm Southern Breeze on Saturday, November 10, 2012
Once, upon a time (in my lifetime), there was little to no need for $uch $pending as we recently witnessed in the November 2012 General Election.
Formerly, Pre$ident$ and Congre$$ were elected without much money.
Now, due in large part to perverted interpretation of our Constitution from activist judges – whom have been largely installed by those whom decry the same – money has been equated with free speech.
But the solitary problem with that SCOTUS ruling is that ~if~ it is so (that money is free speech), then the poor man has none. And our founders most certainly did NOT write, nor did they assert any such thing as “money is freedom” of any kind.
Ref: Buckley v Valeo & Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
Those two rulings are perversions of justice, twisted interpretations of our Constitution and common law.
Rate this:
I Gotta' Share This!
Like this:
Related
This entry was posted on Saturday, November 10, 2012 at 7:40 PM and is filed under - Faith, Religion, Goodness - What is the Soul of a man?, - Lost In Space: TOTALLY Discombobulated, - My Hometown is the sweetest place I know, - Politics... that "dirty" little "game" that first begins in the home.. Tagged: Antonin Scalia, Buckley, Buckley v. Valeo, Citizens United, commentary, David Wiggins, fact, Federal Election Commission, Freedom of speech, GOP, Iowa, judicial activism, justice, law, liars, money, opinion, perverts, Republicans, Supreme Court of the United States, truth, United States, United States Constitution. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.